Opinion: Cultural leadership in the theatre

Opinion piece by Lyn Wallis, Director of the Theatre Board for the Australia Council for the Arts

The topic of leadership - what makes a good leader, how to find, grow, and keep good leaders - is on the minds and lips of communities and businesses, both small and large.

It’s also a hot topic for the arts. If you Google the word 'leadership' - no, on second thought, don't do that.  It would take weeks to plough through the ads for high-octane leadership courses, all promising fast money and enhanced performance.  

Perhaps this commercialised image is what makes 'leadership' such a dirty word to many artists. Arts managers and board members are mostly comfortable with it, but to many artists, being named in public as a leader is like being forced to wear a T shirt that says - ‘Trust me, I Know Better’.

Or maybe it is artists' innate suspicion of homogenisation.  The Australia Council’s Theatre Board team had to consider this when we traipsed across the country spruiking our new Cultural Leadership Skills grant categories. We were grilled to a crisp about our definition of ‘leader’; asked 'How is that different from regular skills development?', and 'Why do we have to be labelled anyway?'  The thing that really bowled me over though, was that some outstanding artists felt so uncomfortable about identifying themselves as leaders that we had to beseech them to apply for the new $20K grants for leadership development.  I raised this with Nicola Turner of the UK’s prestigious Cultural Leadership Programme which has distributed over 12 million pounds to the UK arts sector, and she reported the same experience - but only in the beginning. Now that their program is well established, the UK arts industry has seen the power of a more active and structured approach to developing leaders. Yet the egalitarian Australian artist might ask, ‘why do we need it here?’

We need it because Australia’s arts community is like Australia itself: fuelled by an extraordinary diversity of race, age, gender, sexuality, ability, and geography. Every profession should reflect that diversity and, to the extent that art is a mirror of society, the arts community is doubly obliged. Yet it does not always happen. The vitality of our streets and neighbourhoods is often missing from our stages. If you are an artist from a culturally diverse background, the road to success will be decidedly more uphill. If you are doing it in isolation, it is steeper again. Some unbreakable spirits get there, but not enough, and that is a loss to everyone. To turn this around requires robust cultural leadership, but not the homogenised kind. 

Sure, we need definitions, and the official definition of 'leadership' attached to the Theatre Board’s Cultural Leadership grant opportunities uses all the correct words. There is ‘vision’ and ‘motivation’, ’inspiration’ and ‘fortitude’.  There is 'sustainability'. But, when out in the field talking to artists, we have learned to be more personal.   Often we point out the leader-like traits of the very artist sitting in front of us, so that their own achievements and future potential are reflected clearly back to them.

At the Australia Council, we know what our artistic leaders, our cultural leaders, look like. They are the ‘go to’ people, the first names that pop into your head when you need to get communities informed, wrestling with issues, or engaging in serious debate. They bring cool ideas to the big table, and have the strategies to make those ideas play out. Other artists are drawn to them for advice or help, because they know that even if this person can’t solve their problem, they’ll know someone who can. They hang in there when the going gets tough and know how to take their colleagues with them. Yes, their actions encapsulate all the buzz words. They have incredible vision, they motivate others and demonstrate fortitude in the face of adversity. Most importantly, they possess that intangible gift: the ability to inspire change.

I recently heard Jude Kelly, Director of London’s Southbank Centre, speak at the World Theatre Festival in Brisbane. Rather than talk of arts venue bricks and mortar, she spoke of the need, within our professional practice, to embrace community and the artistic potential of all people. She spoke not only of every child as a potential artist, but of giving every child the opportunity to be an artist. Of course, not every young person will become one, but this guiding principle has led to some astonishing, life-changing outcomes for gifted children in developing countries. Now imagine if we saw every artist as a leader - gave every artist the opportunity to be a cultural leader. Imagine the capacity this would create, not only to inspire positive change within the walls of our tiny theatre sector, but out there, to be a cultural leader in our wider communities, including many that are disadvantaged. Imagine the diversity of leadership that would be encouraged to blossom.

It’s often easy to identify the leaders of the present. What is more difficult is unearthing and nurturing the new champions of diversity. Our theatre sector is full of tolerant, inclusive individuals, but the closer you get to the big end of town, and our major stages, the more diversity has been leached from artistic programming. Recent media debate about the low representation of women directors and playwrights in major theatre programming has yet again exposed our failure to deal with one injustice that has haunted us for decades. As the cultural identity of Australian society continues to change, we see growth in the number of talented culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) artists, yet very few opportunities for them within the current theatre landscape.
Napoleon Bonaparte said, ‘The only way to lead people is to show them a future: a leader is a dealer in hope’. I’d like to think that the Australia Council’s timely promotion of leadership as a key strategic priority will strengthen leadership in all art forms, especially areas that are fragile or under-represented. Senior arts leaders must have opportunities to mature and stop them from burning out. More critically, we need greater diversity amongst our emerging leaders; a multiplicity of leadership that can speak for the full scope of the sector. We need it within our regional, CALD and Indigenous theatre communities. We need it for our young artists. We need it for our women creatives and our artists with disability. And we need it for our audiences. One size will not fit all, and we need more dealers in hope, to inspire positive change amongst us all.

Lyn Wallis  

Share on Facebook

Comments

  • Stephen Lloyd Helper 12:19am on 28 Aug 2011
    I agree entirely with these comments. Unfortunately there continues to be a bias towards emerging merchants of hope where, I believe in my case, true leadership is also found through deep experience. Over 5 years ago I struck out on my own to address the LACK of diversity on the Australian stage. I became so disenchanted and astounded that so little on the stage reflected the society we live in - and when it does, it is a narrow, already well-tilled piece of pasture. And, I can tell you, it has and continues to be a giagantic struggle, despite the overwhelming success of the bilingual Greek production I created called CAFE REBETIKA! including sold out seasons at the Opera House, the Arts Centre and now with a return season in November at the Arts Centre. I can also tell you sincerely that there is limited to no interest in this kind of show at any of the major theatre companies. Simon Phillips loved the show but said MTC subscribers wouldn't be happy. Cate and Andrew saw a rough reading of it and while they were interested, Andrew's first comment was... "it's very Greek, isn't it." This was not considered a positive in terms of audience response. There is terror at losing subscribers as opposed to a desire to broaden subscribers' experiences and more importantly, expand subscriber bases to include people from non-Anglo Celtic backgrounds. (Despite the rhetoric.) There is an exclusion zone for work that has the depth of authenticity in culture that isn't immediately recognisable as "Australian" - despite this work being completely Australian made. This zone permeates the entire theatre cultural structure, despite conferences, Long Paddock/APAM forums and other talk fests about diversifying audiences and productions. Not a single person from the Helpmann's, the Green Room awards, Sydney Critics awards etc. etc. even came to see CAFE REBETIKA! Currency Press didn't attend. It is a kind of landmark production of the highest professional standards in creating work of true diversity, one of the first of its kind in the history of Australian Theatre, but it comes and goes with its significance realised by the people in all those sold out houses who attend it but left unattended by the people who stand up and say how important creating work of cultural diversity is to the future of Australian Theatre and its audiences. I am undeterred - and perhaps was too hopeful that they would attend. The Australia Council is great as are the Arts Centre in Melbourne and Kultour. All are really trying to effect some change. However, in The Australia Council's championing of leadership, I think the recent grants to help independent producers was most misguided in this regard. It wasn't about creative leadership. It was about bolstering worthy people to help produce other creative artists' shows by supporting infrastructure and the kind of budget things that ultimately could be called "photocopiers". Now believe, me, I don't think that is bad in of itself. I wish I had a photocopier And certainly all the recipients of those grants deserved them. I consider myself a true Creative Producer. I look at society, I look at the bland theatrical offerings now even affecting Belvoir (even "innovative productions" are becoming so self-conciously innovative that they are bland and even nonsensical with so little relation to the text), and I say I want to improve the situation. I want, and have the mastery and tools, to new create work that reflects the society, the hopes, desires, triumphs and tragedies of Australia, in which I live. To explore and draw upon the great ethnic diversity of this marvellous place because I think great theatre throughout history reflects the time and place in which it is created. I am mature enough to know that this does not mean the work needs to be set in Australia necessarily and that sometimes the power of allegory can be even more illuminating about one's own country. But what it does need to do is GROW OUT OF Australia - which is far more fertile and astonishing than just the Anglo Celtic paddock. No other Creative Producer that I have found, other than Scott Rankin and sometimes Marguerite Pepper, seem to get this and daily fights the independent fight for work of cultural diversity. And, I think, we are finding that we create work that Australians WANT to see and tell stories that are important to us all. And, this is why we do what we do. I humbly beg the apology of anyone who feels that they too fight this fight and I sincerely salute you. In my recent work with emerging indigenous performers at the Aboriginal Centre for Performing Arts in Brisbane, I conceived and then developed with them a production about 21st century indigenous identity - THEIR identities. We presented it at QPAC with sensational results - wonderful reviews and thrilling audience reactions. Would anyone from the Powerhouse, QTC or other arts organisations come and see it? No. Half of QPAC didn't even know it was on (as I called a number of contacts there who were surprised I was in town and that this work was happening at all). This work is bearing further fruit and I have evolved it into a new theatre work about an indigenous man trying to climb the corporate ladder. It is thrilling and the collaboration with three of the original participants is a complete joy. I do not claim to know of all the theatre work of cultural diversity that is created in Australia. However, I do know that very very little of it ever achieves prominence in the mainstream where, if it is of high qualtiy, I think it belongs. In some ways, I think this is because it could be a threat to the long-standing, rigidly (if unconsciously) maintained status quo of what is "Australian Theatre". I believe it's a status quo that runs throughout the entire construct of what is celebrated as Australian Theatre. Independent Creative Producing is an answer. There are many times that I say that I am only producing because nobody else will. The more I create, the less I want to produce but then it won't get off the ground so... I produce. I am genuinely altruistic, maybe even naive. But that is a source of my empathy for and my understanding of other people and other cultures that are part of Australia, so I guard it carefully. It is a crazy tightrope to walk - the pragmatism/realism of a producer and the artistry and vision of a "creative". Luckily for me, at a gut level, I really do love both in my passion to better represent the wealth of Australia's cultural diversity on mainstream stages in this country and around the world. An actor friend of mine who is not from an Anglo-Celtic background said that she thought that "we are ahead of our time." Funny thought to share between people who are over 50. Magdalena Moreno (CEO of Kultour) said to me that she thought (and hoped) that in 10 - 15 years time, CAFE REBETIKA! would not be considered an unusual representation of Australia's cultural diversity - or even considered in that category - that theatre and audiences would evolve to not just accept such a work but expect such a work as Australian. Like all merchants of hope, I hope she's right - and not for me, but for the growth and continuing evolution of exploring, celebrating and expanding our concept of Australian Theatre culture as one of infinite variety and embracing the incredible histories and heritages of our fellow Australians. This can enrich our lives, entertain us and help us live together with an ever-increasing acceptance of and interest in each other. Hey - who put that soap box under my feet? So, my next step, in keeping with this vision above, is to create Big Picture Theatre Productions, Inc. and get on with the work of working with diverse communities and evolving professional, vigorous, authentic, communicative theatre art together. All aboard!

Post a comment